TAKEAWAYS from the 2026 ASA Staffing Law & Compliance Conference

Advance Partners recently attended the ASA Staffing Law & Compliance Conference in Washington, DC. It was a packed agenda—smart, candid sessions on the issues that matter right now. Here are the main takeaways we brought home from discussions on immigration compliance, AI in recruiting and operations, and the evolving landscape of employment laws.

Major Takeaways

Immigration

H- 1B Program

  • A newly introduced law, H.R. 6937 (“End H-1B Now Act”) would be burdensome for staffing—early language has included prohibitions on staffing firm use. It’s unlikely to advance, but it’s critical to monitor and engage to prevent harmful provisions.
  • For now, H-1Bs remain viable for specialty occupations. Consistency across filings is essential amid a stricter enforcement environment.

I- 9 and E- Verify

  • Audit activity and penalties are up significantly (reported 10x increase). Fines average around $3,000 per violation and up to $30,000 for knowingly employing someone without work authorization.
  • Unique risks for staffing include high volume and decentralized onboarding leading to errors, shared ownership blurring accountability, and remote/ electronic I- 9s creating audit trail gaps.
  • Staffing owners are encouraged to spell out responsibilities in contracts, validate systems and processes, and tighten reverification procedures and documentation.

AI Regulation

  • AI is generating a new wave of regulations. The firms that get ahead of this now—maintaining transparency with clients and showing a governance framework—will have a genuine advantage.
  • Don’t wait for a “perfect” solution; that’s already behind the curve.
  • Using AI to assist with employment decisions is high risk. Screening tools can pattern match in ways that exclude qualified candidates with non- linear paths (LLMs don’t recognize redemption arcs!).
  • State AI/ AEDT laws are proliferating quickly; federal preemption via executive action is possible but uncertain.
  • Your existing obligations under the Civil Rights Act and ADA still apply when you use AI. Consider standardizing on an enterprise tool to simplify compliance.
  • Practical governance moves include adopting a company- wide AI policy, establishing a governance committee, keeping human oversight for decision making, and training employees on approved tools and safety practices.

Employment Laws

  • Compliance is a business risk and should be treated like one
  • The single biggest failure is not taking a systematic, programmatic approach to compliance.
  • Employment laws are exploding: 59 state/local minimum wage laws, pay transparency requirements, paid sick leave mandates, 150+ background check laws across states, industry- specific rules like nursing parity laws, wage/hour class and collective actions growing.
  • Staffing is uniquely at risk because multiple client sites employ varying timekeeping, joint- employer exposure, high turnover (error risk), and franchise/ field execution gaps. Corporate policies can break down on the front lines due to sheer scale.
  • Failures happen when compliance is missed and where a new law or rule wasn’t captured/ implemented. They also happen in execution where policy exists, but people/products/tech fail to execute consistently.

The legal landscape is getting more complex, and enforcement is rising. Our main takeaway from ASA Law is that the firms that win will turn compliance into a capability—protecting margin, earning trust with clients, and reducing surprises. If you need help translating these takeaways into an action plan, tap ASA’s resources and your counsel—and start with governance, training, and a simple audit/monitor cycle you can sustain.